What 2,023 whole genomes reveal about bowel cancer — and why it changes the map
The UK's 100,000 Genomes Project sequenced the entire genome of more than two thousand colorectal cancers — the most detailed picture yet of a common cancer, and a case study in what whole-genome sequencing adds over the panels used today.
The genomic landscape of 2,023 colorectal cancers
Cornish, Gruber, Kinnersley et al. · Nature 2024; 633(8028):127–136 · via PubMed · DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07747-9
Source CC BY 4.0 · cleared for reuseThe study
Using the UK 100,000 Genomes Project, researchers performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on 2,023 colorectal cancers — the most detailed genomic picture of this common cancer to date. WGS reads the entire genome, not just a shortlist of known cancer genes, so it can surface drivers and patterns that targeted panels miss.
What they found
- 250+ putative driver genes, many never previously linked to colorectal cancer — including recurrent changes outside the protein-coding genome, a region standard testing ignores.
- Four new common subgroups of microsatellite-stable cancer, defined by genomic features such as whole-genome doubling and chromosomal instability — each carrying independent prognostic information.
- Rare but clinically relevant subgroups, including tumours showing both microsatellite and chromosomal instability.
- Clues to cause: a mutational signature linking E. coli colibactin to rectal cancers, and the SBS93 signature pointing to diet or smoking as a risk factor.
- Near-universal immune escape in heavily mutated tumours, and in about half of microsatellite-stable cancers — often via HLA copy-number changes, which bears on immunotherapy response.
- Many drivers are actionable (for example BRCA1, IDH1) — an existing or trial drug may target them.
Why it matters
This is the clearest evidence yet that whole-genome sequencing adds clinical value over targeted panels in a common cancer: new prognostic subgroups, actionable rare variants, and aetiological signals — diet, smoking, a bacterial toxin — all emerged from reading the whole genome. It is also a proof point for the NHS's national sequencing infrastructure.
This is a descriptive genomic landscape, not a clinical trial. “Actionable” means potentially targetable, not proven to improve outcomes, and translating these subgroups into everyday pathways still needs prospective validation.
Continuing professional development
Learning outcomes
- Explain what whole-genome sequencing adds over targeted gene panels in colorectal cancer.
- Describe how genomic subgroups can carry prognostic and treatment-relevant information.
- Interpret “actionable mutation” and “mutational signature” in clinical context.
Reflection prompts
- How might whole-genome-defined subgroups change how you explain prognosis to a patient?
- What would need to be true for these subgroups to enter routine pathways where you work?